How to run a game night on a video call

The failure modes are predictable, which means they are avoidable.

· 6 min read

Everything that goes wrong is a latency problem

A video call adds roughly a quarter of a second between you speaking and somebody hearing it. In conversation that is invisible. In a game where speed decides who wins, it decides who wins — and it always decides in favour of whoever has the better connection.

This is why "first to shout the answer" games are miserable remotely and brilliant in person. It is not that the game is worse; it is that the game is now measuring broadband.

The same delay is what makes people talk over each other. Two people start speaking in the same 250ms window, both hear the other a beat later, both stop, both start again. Any game that depends on a room finding its natural turn-taking rhythm will fight this all evening.

Pick games where the app arbitrates

The fix is to stop relying on the room to decide who goes next. If the game holds the turn order, the timer and the score, the call goes back to being what it is good at: faces and voices.

Codenames is close to ideal. The clue-giver speaks once, everyone else discusses, and nothing is timed to the millisecond. Draw & Guess works because the drawing carries the information and the typing settles who got there first — the voice channel becomes commentary rather than the mechanism.

Forehead is the surprise one. It looks like it needs a room, and it works better on a call than in person: everyone can see the word on their own screen, which is exactly the thing that is awkward with one shared phone.

Mafia is worth the extra effort but only with a host who is comfortable running a call. The night phase is much easier remotely — nobody peeks — and the day phase needs someone willing to say "let Priya finish".

Run it on two devices

The single biggest improvement to a remote game night is asking everyone to join the call on a laptop and the game on their phone. It sounds fussy and takes thirty seconds.

Sharing one screen between the call and the game means everybody spends the evening alt-tabbing, misses reactions, and loses the thing that made you want to do this on a call rather than in a group chat. Two devices keeps faces on the big screen and the game in your hand, which is roughly how it works in person.

A running order that works

Open with something that needs no explanation and tolerates late arrivals — people will be five minutes late, and a game that cannot absorb that means the first fifteen minutes are spent waiting.

Put the game that needs the most explaining second, when everyone is present and nobody is bored yet. Rules explained to a full, attentive call take two minutes; the same explanation to a half-empty one gets repeated three times.

Then keep the last third loose. The best remote game nights end with the game running quietly in the background while people talk, which is the closest a call gets to a living room. Do not schedule that part — just stop starting new rounds when the conversation is better than the game.

The games in this post

More like these on Games for Video Calls.

Also worth reading